nba lines for sunday, november 9th in the "royal sports" nba contest ..(picks thread)

[bucsfan67]

Sun 11/9 501 Denver Nuggets +6
12:30 PM 502 Toronto Raptors -6

Sun 11/9 503 Sacramento Kings -3.5 +
06:05 PM 504 Boston Celtics +3.5

Sun 11/9 505 Indiana Pacers +4.5
06:05 PM 506 Philadelphia 76ers -4.5

Sun 11/9 507 New Jersey Nets +6
06:05 PM 508 Detroit Pistons -6

Sun 11/9 509 Atlanta Hawks +7.5
09:05 PM 510 Seattle Supersonics -7.5



**** GUYS, I HAD COMPUTER PROBLEMS AND COULD NOT GET ONLINE TIL THIS MORNING TO GET THE LINES, AND THERE IS ONE GAME GOING REAL EARLY, AND SEVERAL IN THE LATE AFTERNOON.....SINCE I COULD NOT GET THE LINES POSTED TIL THIS LATE, AND IT IS MY FAULT, ANYONE NOT MAKING A PLAY TODAY, WILL JUST BE A NO-PLAY.....NO WIN , NO LOSS, NO PENALTY.....ITS NOT FAIR TO THE PLAYERS, AND EVERYONE IS WORRIED ABOUT NFL RIGHT NOW, I DONT WANT TO PENALIZE A PLAYER BECAUSE MY COMPUTER WAS DOWN.....IF U MAKE YOUR PLAY, GREAT, IF U DONT GET IT IN......IT WILL NOT COUNT AGAINST YOU.......TAHNKS GUYS...

 

[Dante]

Raptors WILL NOT cover the -6

81 points

 

[bucsfan67]

PACERS +4.5 WILL COVER....85 POINTS

 

[TheQuietMan+]

Philadelphia - 4.5 will not cover

89 points

 

[TomorrowsNewspaper+]

new jersey +6 will cover

88 points

 

[IntuitionBET]

bucsfan67 - How come you won't answer me in this other thread of yours after you bad mouth me and then call me a liar? Please reply.

http://therxforum.com/6/ubb.x?q=Y&s=100090022&a=tpc&f=988094022&m=32710027&r=40410327#40410327

bucsfan67 writes: "is there a rule against 2 people from the same family (assuming its true, which is sketchy since you have already lied in this thread)?"

Which is in response to the Royal clerk Christina being the daughter of Royal's in-house bookeeper/account and Roberto's girlfriend (which I don't have a problem with BTW)

 

[bucsfan67]

there is no reason to get into anything with you ib....you know as well as i do that u knew who christina was long before u asked if she worked for g.a........that is what i meant about lying, not about her being related...i have no clue to that, i dont know her, and it makes no difference to me.....you obviously have things going on with royal according to their posts, lawsuits and such, so your opinion of them will obviously be jaded....as for the players in the contest, we appreciate the taking over of the contest by them...

now this is a contest thread, please do not crap it up with all this....if u have any questions for me, u can direct them to me via email......bew47710@aol.com

 

[IntuitionBET]

bucsfan67 - Her real name is NOT christina. So when you mentioned a Christina at Royal I thought she was new, as noone has ever mentioned a Christina in here.
So stop playing this game..and I suppose she has jaded you with her side of the story which is B.S.

As Confucius says: "You can tell more about a man by not what he says of himself, but what he says of others"

Now that that has been said our buddy the Spin Doctor will study what it means and prepare for it.

BTW YOU crapped up this sh*t in your own thread by starting this. So go read the thread above and take responsibility for your own actions.

 

[TTinCO]

IB, as far as you being called a liar, didn't the courts seem to agree with that particular accusation? Maybe in the last.....let's say, 5 days?

 

[IntuitionBET]

TTinCo - Being that you just posted that after you admited to being in Royal offices recently we would assume you have been told this directly from Roberto.

That is not true TTinCo. And a little advice to Roberto...you better stop making these false statements to and through people like TTinCo because if you don't you will have a lawsuit coming from me as well as my associate.

You better consult this with your attorney Roberto because you are just hurting yourself legally. That's FREE advice btw

 

[TTinCO]

Gosh IB, I guess that the fax copy of the court ruling that I read must have been complete bullshit......

 

[IntuitionBET]

Thanks TTinCO I mean Roberto for that information.

 

[TTinCO]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Intuition BET:

That is not true TTinCo.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Is that another lie, or am I missing something? What is not true? Based on the courts ruling, it sure sounds to me like they certainly did agree that you had lied, which, last time I checked-pretty much made you "a liar". What am I missing here?

 

[TTinCO]

Well?????????